Skip to main content

Chicago Tribune Takes AI Search Engine to Court Over Content Scraping

Chicago Tribune Files Lawsuit Against Perplexity Over Content Use

The Chicago Tribune has escalated its battle against artificial intelligence companies, filing a federal lawsuit against Perplexity AI in New York. The newspaper accuses the search engine company of systematically scraping its content without authorization and circumventing paywalls to deliver protected journalism to users.

The Core Allegations

According to court documents, Tribune lawyers first raised concerns with Perplexity in mid-October. While the AI company claimed it didn't use Tribune articles as training data, it admitted that "some factual summaries may have occurred." The newspaper's legal team contends this response significantly understates the issue.

Image

"What we're seeing goes far beyond simple summarization," explained a source familiar with the case. "They're reproducing our reporting with such precision that it threatens both our business model and journalistic integrity."

Technology Under Scrutiny

The lawsuit specifically targets Perplexity's Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system. Designed to reduce AI bias by referencing verified sources, the technology appears to have incorporated Tribune content without permission. Additionally, the complaint highlights concerns about Perplexity's Comet browser allegedly bypassing paywalls to provide full article summaries.

This isn't the first time media companies have pushed back against AI firms. Earlier this year, MediaNews Group and Tribune Publishing—which collectively own 17 news organizations—filed similar complaints against OpenAI and Microsoft. Nine of these outlets had already initiated legal action last November.

Industry-Wide Implications

The case could set important precedents for how courts view AI search technologies within copyright law frameworks. As more publishers grow wary of having their content used without compensation, this lawsuit may inspire similar actions across the industry.

Perplexity hasn't yet responded publicly to the allegations or requests for comment from various media outlets. The company currently faces other legal challenges from Reddit and Dow Jones, while Amazon recently issued a cease-and-desist notice regarding Perplexity's shopping-related AI features.

Key Points:

  • Legal Action: Chicago Tribune sues Perplexity for unauthorized content use
  • Technology Focus: RAG system allegedly incorporates protected content without permission
  • Broader Trend: Part of growing media pushback against AI content practices
  • Potential Impact: Could influence how courts interpret copyright in AI context

Enjoyed this article?

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest AI news, product reviews, and project recommendations delivered to your inbox weekly.

Weekly digestFree foreverUnsubscribe anytime

Related Articles

New York Times Takes Legal Action Against AI Startup Over Content Scraping
News

New York Times Takes Legal Action Against AI Startup Over Content Scraping

The New York Times has filed a lawsuit against AI search company Perplexity, alleging unauthorized use of copyrighted content. The complaint cites nearly 180,000 visits to NYTimes.com in one month and accuses Perplexity of reproducing articles almost verbatim through its AI system. This marks the second major copyright lawsuit by the Times against AI companies, following their case against OpenAI/Microsoft last year.

December 9, 2025
AI copyrightNew York TimesPerplexity
News

Authors Sue Adobe Over Alleged Use of Pirated Books in AI Training

Adobe faces a class-action lawsuit accusing the tech giant of using pirated books to train its SlimLM AI model. Oregon author Elizabeth Lyon claims her copyrighted work was included in the controversial Books3 dataset without permission. This legal battle highlights growing tensions between creators and AI developers over copyright issues.

December 18, 2025
AI copyrightAdobe lawsuitBooks3 controversy
AI Outperforms Humans in Literary Imitation, Sparks Copyright Debate
News

AI Outperforms Humans in Literary Imitation, Sparks Copyright Debate

A study reveals AI models fine-tuned with minimal data can mimic famous authors' styles more effectively than human professionals, raising legal questions about fair use. Readers preferred AI-generated texts, which cost 99.7% less to produce than human-written imitations.

October 27, 2025
AI copyrightliterary imitationfair use
Disney Forces Character.AI to Remove Mickey Mouse and Other IPs
News

Disney Forces Character.AI to Remove Mickey Mouse and Other IPs

Disney issued a legal demand to Character.AI, resulting in the removal of all Disney-related characters from the platform. The company cited copyright infringement and concerns over inappropriate content. Users found loopholes with lesser-known Disney-linked characters still available.

October 3, 2025
AI copyrightDisneyCharacter.AI
News

Penske Media Sues Google Over AI Summaries in Landmark Case

Penske Media Group has filed a lawsuit against Google, alleging unauthorized use of its news content for AI-generated search summaries. The publisher claims this practice harms revenue and traffic, marking a pivotal moment in digital copyright disputes. Google defends its AI features as beneficial for user experience and website discovery.

September 15, 2025
AI copyrightGoogle lawsuitDigital media
Perplexity AI Launches $42.5M Revenue Share for Publishers
News

Perplexity AI Launches $42.5M Revenue Share for Publishers

Perplexity AI has introduced a $42.5 million Publisher Revenue Sharing Program to compensate news organizations for content usage. The initiative, funded through its Comet Plus subscription service, aims to address copyright disputes while creating a new revenue stream for publishers like Time Magazine and the Los Angeles Times.

August 26, 2025
AI copyrightPerplexityAImedia partnerships